What it does. Evaluate design quality consistently without pretending that a score is an award outcome. Keep design quality, presentation quality, and evidence confidence separate. Require the user to choose the maturity track.
- Evaluate the supplied design and supplied presentation materials. - Classify one primary discipline, one primary sector, and optional secondary labels and focus tags. - Build an evidence ledger before scoring. - Score the general rubric and report Critical findings separately. - Apply an optional award-aligned lens only when the user already names a target award. - Batch-evaluate a fixed corpus only after the user approves the maturity mapping for every included record. - Produce score-based shortlists within each maturity track; never cross-rank Student Concept and Mature Work.
Highlights
- Evaluate the supplied design and supplied presentation materials.
- Classify one primary discipline, one primary sector, and optional secondary labels and focus tags.
- Build an evidence ledger before scoring.
- Score the general rubric and report Critical findings separately.
- Apply an optional award-aligned lens only when the user already names a target award.
When to use it. Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report…
Install
npx skills add SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills --skill design-evaluation
Or copy the skill folder manually:
git clone https://github.com/SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills.git
cp -r design-judge-skills/skills/design-evaluation/ ~/.claude/skills/design-evaluation
Source: SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills — 1,022 stars, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-08-24.
