Low-level debugging gets a boost from AI. How Claude Code assists with kernel panics, driver issues, and system-level crashes that traditional tools struggle to diagnose.
Kernel-level debugging occupies a special tier of difficulty. There's no debugger attached to a running kernel by default. Stack traces reference memory addresses, not source lines. The bug might live in a driver you didn't write, in an interrupt handler that fires microseconds before a context switch, or in a memory corruption that manifests far from its cause.
For decades, kernel debugging meant printk statements, crash dumps analyzed with specialized tools, and deep knowledge of hardware-software interaction. AI doesn't replace this expertise, but it transforms the most labor-intensive parts: correlating crash addresses with source code, interpreting register dumps, and building hypotheses about what sequence of events led to the panic.
When a userspace program crashes, you get a stack trace with function names, line numbers, and variable values. When a kernel panics, you get a register dump, a call trace with hex addresses, and the contents of whatever was in the kernel log buffer at the time.
Translating that information into actionable debugging context requires several manual steps. You need the exact kernel binary that was running (not a different build). You need the symbol table. You need to run addr2line or equivalent tools to map addresses to source. You need to understand the calling conventions of the architecture to interpret the register state.
AI compresses this pipeline. Given a panic log and access to the kernel source tree, Claude Code maps addresses to source locations, interprets register contents in the context of the faulting function, and identifies the likely cause of the fault.
The kernel log output during a panic contains everything you need for initial analysis. On Linux, this appears in dmesg, the serial console, or the netconsole output. On macOS, kernel panics are logged to /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports.
Capture the complete log, including the call trace, register dump, and any preceding warnings or errors. The lines before the panic are often more informative than the panic itself, because they show what the kernel was doing when things went wrong.
AI needs access to the source code that corresponds to the running kernel. For mainline Linux, this means the correct branch and commit. For custom kernels, this means your source tree.
Point Claude Code at the source directory and share the panic log. The AI will correlate addresses with source locations and begin analysis.
Instead of "what caused this panic," ask specific questions:
Targeted questions produce better answers because they constrain the AI's search space. Broad questions lead to generic analysis. Specific questions lead to specific insights.
If the panic is intermittent, collecting multiple crash logs and asking the AI to identify common patterns is extremely valuable. The AI might notice that every crash occurs within 100ms of a USB device being connected, or that the faulting address is always in the same driver's probe function, or that the crashes correlate with memory pressure.
Pattern identification across crash reports is where AI provides the most leverage. A human reviewing five crash logs might miss that the timer interrupt count is suspiciously similar across all five. The AI checks everything.
A kernel object is freed while another subsystem still holds a reference. The freed memory is reallocated for a different purpose, and the stale reference now points to garbage data. AI identifies this by tracing reference counting in the faulting module and checking whether the refcount could reach zero while references are outstanding.
Taking lock A then lock B in one codepath and lock B then lock A in another creates a deadlock risk. AI builds a lock dependency graph from the source code and identifies cycles. This is particularly valuable for kernel code where locks are often acquired across subsystem boundaries.
Drivers that perform DMA must map and unmap memory regions correctly. Mapping errors cause data corruption or crashes that manifest far from the actual bug. AI checks DMA mapping calls against the driver's data flow to verify that every dma_map has a corresponding dma_unmap with the correct parameters.
Kernel stacks are small (typically 8KB on Linux). Deep call chains or large local variables can overflow the stack, corrupting adjacent memory. AI estimates stack usage along the faulting call chain and flags functions with large local allocations.
Consider a macOS kernel panic with this key information:
panic: "a]]]]] ]n]]]]]s]o]l]v]e]d] ]k]e]r]n]e]l] ]t]r]a]p]"
Kernel Extensions in backtrace:
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(900.4.2)
com.vendor.usb-driver(1.0.3)
The garbled panic string immediately suggests memory corruption near the panic message buffer. AI identifies this as consistent with a DMA overrun from the USB driver, where a DMA transfer writes past the end of its allocated buffer into adjacent kernel memory.
The AI traces the vendor driver's DMA setup code and finds a buffer size calculation that doesn't account for the USB device's maximum packet size. Under normal operation, transfers fit within the buffer. When a device sends a maximum-size packet, the transfer overruns by 64 bytes.
The fix is straightforward: allocate a buffer sized to the maximum transfer, not the typical transfer. But finding the root cause without AI required correlating the garbled text pattern with the DMA buffer layout, a connection that's obvious in retrospect but hard to make when staring at a hex dump.
The most effective approach is to build a debugging skill tailored to your kernel environment. This skill should include:
Architecture-specific knowledge. Register names, calling conventions, and stack layout for your target architecture. ARM64's exception model differs significantly from x86-64's, and the skill should know which one it's working with.
Subsystem context. If you primarily debug storage drivers, the skill should understand block layer semantics, scatter-gather lists, and queue management. If you debug network drivers, it should understand NAPI, sk_buffs, and interrupt coalescing.
Your build system. The skill should know how to find symbol files, source trees, and debug information for your specific kernel build configuration.
Common failure patterns. Every kernel subsystem has its characteristic failure modes. Encoding these in the skill gives AI a head start on hypothesis generation.
For teams working on Apple platforms, the upcoming article on Apple Silicon optimization covers hardware-specific considerations that affect kernel debugging on M-series chips.
AI cannot replace a kernel debugger. It cannot set breakpoints in a running kernel, inspect live memory, or single-step through instructions. These capabilities require tools like LLDB with kernel debugging support, JTAG debuggers, or hypervisor-based debugging.
What AI does is reduce the time between "I have a crash log" and "I have a hypothesis worth testing." That time reduction matters because kernel debugging often involves long iteration cycles: reproduce the crash, collect more data, analyze, form a new hypothesis, repeat. Shortening the analysis step from hours to minutes compresses the entire debugging timeline.
AI also struggles with hardware-specific behaviors that aren't documented in source code. If a crash is caused by a CPU errata, a memory controller quirk, or a bus timing issue, the AI has no source code to analyze. These issues require hardware documentation and sometimes a logic analyzer.
Partially. AI can interpret panic logs, register dumps, and call traces using general knowledge of kernel architecture. But without source code, it cannot map addresses to specific functions or trace data flow through the faulting module. Source access dramatically improves analysis quality.
x86-64 and ARM64 have the most representation in AI training data, so analysis of these architectures tends to be most accurate. RISC-V is improving as more kernel work targets that architecture. Exotic architectures may receive less precise analysis.
They're complementary. KASAN and similar tools instrument the kernel at build time to detect specific bug classes (buffer overflows, use-after-free) at runtime. AI analyzes crash reports after the fact to diagnose any class of bug. Use KASAN to catch bugs during development and AI to diagnose bugs that reach production.
Kernel panic logs may contain sensitive information: kernel addresses (useful for KASLR bypass), hardware identifiers, and occasionally fragments of user data from kernel buffers. Evaluate your threat model before sharing. For sensitive environments, use locally-hosted AI models or redact addresses and identifiers before sharing.
Explore production-ready AI skills at aiskill.market/browse or submit your own skill to the marketplace.
Comprehensive Claude Code enhancement plugin with 27.9K+ GitHub stars. Includes TDD, systematic debugging, brainstorming, and plan-driven development workflows.
Recognize patterns of context failure: lost-in-middle, poisoning, distraction, and clash
Teaches Claude how to use the linear-CLI tool for issue tracking
Lab environment for experimenting with Claude superpowers and capabilities.